Document public
| Titre : | Parallel Report of the Defender of Rights as part of the examination of the Initial Report by France on the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities |
| Voir aussi : | |
| Auteurs : | Défenseur des droits, Auteur |
| Type de document : | Rapports et études |
| Année de publication : | 07/2021 |
| Format : | 41 p. |
| Langues: | Anglais |
| Mots-clés : |
[Géographie] France [Mots-clés] Handicap [Mots-clés] Convention internationale relative aux droits des personnes handicapées (CIDPH) [Mots-clés] Discrimination [Mots-clés] Accessibilité [Mots-clés] Aménagement raisonnable [Mots-clés] Enfant [Mots-clés] Situation de famille [Mots-clés] Accès au droit [Mots-clés] Justice [Mots-clés] Libertés publiques et individuelles [Mots-clés] Respect de la vie privée et familiale [Mots-clés] Éducation [Mots-clés] Santé - soins [Mots-clés] Emploi [Mots-clés] Travailleur handicapé |
| Mots-clés: | Sensibilisation ; inclusion ; inclusion sociale |
| Résumé : |
Through this parallel report, the Defender of Rights wishes, in view of the list of points adopted by the pre-session working group in its twelfth session (23-27 September 2019), and based on the updated findings of its 2020 report, to contribute to enlightening the Committee on the subjects which deserve special attention in the context of examining France’s initial report during the 25th session (August 16-September 24, 2021).
For the Defender of Rights, the results of the CRPD’s implementation by France are mixed. While much progress has undeniably been made in recent years, significant gaps remain. In this regard, while welcoming the political ambition to make disability a priority issue, the Defender of Rights finds that France has not yet fully taken into account the new rights-based approach, induced by the CRPD, in the development and implementation of public policies. Even if a paradigm shift seems to be taking place today, we must nevertheless regret its unequal appropriation by all the relevant stakeholders. As a result, in many areas, the evolution of the legal framework and the practices brought about by the Convention are not yet effective. There are still many obstacles to the autonomy and inclusion of persons with disabilities linked, on the one hand, to the lack of universal accessibility and, on the other hand, to insufficient or inappropriate responses to the specific needs of the people concerned, which prevents them from effectively participating in society on an equal basis with others. |
| Note de contenu : |
PURPOSE AND GENERAL OBLIGATIONS (ART. 1 TO 4)
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS (ART. 5 TO 30) SPECIAL OBLIGATIONS (ART. 31 to 33) APPENDIX: SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS |
| Thématique Bulletin documentaire PDF : | Handicap - Autonomie |
| Cite : |
|
Documents numériques (1)
 ETU_DDD202107_Parallel_Report.pdf Adobe Acrobat PDF |
